TAX OPINION
Published on March 27, 2008
TROUTMAN SANDERS
LLP
|
||
ATTORNEYS
AT LAW
TROUTMAN
SANDERS BUILDING
1001
HAXALL POINT
RICHMOND,
VIRGINIA 23219
www.troutmansanders.com
TELEPHONE:
804-697-1200
FACSIMILE:
804-697-1339
MAILING
ADDRESS
P.O. BOX
1122
RICHMOND,
VIRGINIA 23218-1122
March 27,
2008
Exhibit
8.1
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
4551 Cox
Road
Suite
300
Glen
Allen, Virginia 23060
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
We have
acted as counsel to Dynex Capital, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“Dynex”), in
connection with the preparation of a registration statement on Form S-3 (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Commission”). The Registration Statement relates to
the issuance and sale by Dynex from time to time, pursuant to Rule 415 (“Rule
415”) of the General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), of the following securities with a
proposed maximum aggregate offering price of up to
$1,000,000,000: (1) shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per
share (the “Common Stock”); (2) shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value
per share, to be issued in one or more series (the “Preferred Stock”); (3) debt
securities, in one or more series, any series of which may be either senior debt
securities or subordinated debt securities (collectively, the “Debt
Securities”); and (4) warrants to purchase Common Stock, Preferred Stock or Debt
Securities (the “Warrants”).
You have
requested our opinion regarding Dynex’s qualification as a real
estate investment trust (“REIT”) pursuant to sections 856 through 860 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for its 2006 taxable
year. Unless otherwise stated, all section references herein are to
the Code. In addition, you have requested our opinion with respect to whether
Dynex’s organization and contemplated method of operations are such as to enable
it to continue to qualify as a REIT for its 2007 taxable year and subsequent
taxable years.
Dynex has
a number of wholly-owned subsidiaries (“qualified REIT subsidiaries”), the
income, liabilities, and assets of which are consolidated with those of Dynex
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This letter refers to Dynex,
together with
ATLANTA • HONG KONG • LONDON • NEW YORK • NEWARK • NORFOLK • RALEIGH
RICHMOND • SHANGHAI • TYSONS CORNER • VIRGINIA BEACH • WASHINGTON, D.C.
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
2
such
subsidiaries, as “Consolidated Dynex.” In connection with the
opinions rendered below, we have examined the following:
1. The
Articles of Incorporation of Dynex, as amended;
2. The
bylaws of Dynex as amended and restated on June 15, 2006;
3. Consolidated
Dynex’s federal income tax returns for its taxable years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
2005 and 2006; and
4. The
prospectus included in the Registration Statement with which this letter has
been filed.
In
connection with the opinions rendered below, we have assumed that:
1. Each
of the documents referred to above has been duly authorized, executed, and
delivered, is authentic, if an original, or accurate, if a copy, and has not
been amended;
2. During
Consolidated Dynex’s 2007 taxable year and subsequent taxable years, it will
continue to conduct its affairs in a manner that will make the representations
set forth below true for such years;
3. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary of Dynex will make any amendments to its organizational
documents after the date of this opinion that would affect Consolidated Dynex’s
qualification as a REIT for any taxable year; and
4. No
actions will be taken by Consolidated Dynex or any subsidiary of Dynex after the
date hereof that would have the effect of altering the facts upon which the
opinions set forth below are based.
Furthermore,
we have relied upon the correctness of the following representations of
Consolidated Dynex and its authorized representatives that, at all times
relevant hereto:
From the
date Dynex and Consolidated Dynex were organized through the date
hereof:
|
1.
|
Dynex
has been managed by one or more trustees or
directors.
|
2. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary thereof has ever been subject by law to the supervision
or examination by state, or federal authorities having supervision over banking
institutions.
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
3
3. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary thereof has ever been a savings institution chartered
or supervised as a savings and loan or similar association under federal or
state law.
4. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary thereof has ever been a small business investment
company operating under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.
5. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary thereof was created by or pursuant to an act of a state
legislature for purposes of promoting, maintaining, and assisting the economy
and industry within a state on a regional or state-wide basis by making loans to
be used in trades or businesses which would generally not be made by banks
within such region or state in the ordinary course of business.
6. Neither
Dynex nor any subsidiary thereof was an insurance company to which Subchapter L
of the Code applies.
7. Beneficial
ownership of the shares of Dynex (the “Shares”) was held by 100 or more
persons.
8. Dynex
is a self-managed entity and its Shares, subject to certain excess share
limitations, are transferable.
9. At
no time during the last half of any taxable year was more than 50% in value of
the outstanding stock of Dynex owned, directly or indirectly, by or for five or
fewer individuals. For this purpose, the Shares are treated as owned
indirectly by or for an individual if such individual would be treated as owning
such Shares under section 544 as modified by section 856(h).
10. Consolidated
Dynex’s election to be treated as a REIT was properly made, has not been
revoked, and Dynex has not been notified that such election has been
terminated.
11. At
the close of each quarter of each taxable year seventy-five percent (75%) or
more of the value of Consolidated Dynex’s total assets consisted of cash and
cash items (including receivables arising in the ordinary course of Consolidated
Dynex’s operations), government securities, and real estate assets (including
interests in real property, interests in mortgages on real property, and
interests in REMICs to the extent provided in section 856(c)(5)(E)), and shares
or transferable certificates of beneficial interest in other qualified REITs)
(the “75% test”).
12. With
respect to any consumer installment loans on manufactured housing, which are
assets of Consolidated Dynex as described in paragraph 11 immediately
above,
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
4
that the
associated manufactured housing units are secured to a site and are inherently
permanent structures.
13. Except
with respect to a taxable REIT subsidiary, not more than five percent (5%) of
the value of Consolidated Dynex’s total assets consisted of securities of any
one issuer unless such securities are treated as real estate assets under the
75% test.
14. Except
with respect to a taxable REIT subsidiary, Consolidated Dynex does not own, and
has not owned, more than ten percent (10%) of the total outstanding voting
securities of any other corporation (or entity treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes) at any point in time since the formation of Dynex,
excluding for purposes of this representation such securities treated as real
estate assets under the 75% test.
15. Except
with respect to a taxable REIT subsidiary, Consolidated Dynex does not own, and
has not owned, more than ten percent (10%) of the total value of the outstanding
securities of any other corporation (or entity treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes) at any point in time since the formation of Dynex,
excluding for purposes of this representation such securities treated as real
estate assets under the 75% test.
16. Consolidated
Dynex did not receive or accrue any rents (other than an inmaterial amount
received from sublease tenants) from either real or personal
property.
17. Consolidated
Dynex did not receive or accrue as income, directly or indirectly, any interest
or other amount determined in whole or in part with reference to the income or
profits derived by any person (excluding interest (A) based solely on a fixed
percentage or percentages of receipts or sales or (B) to the extent described in
section 856(f)(2)).
18. Consolidated
Dynex did not own any mortgage whose terms entitled it to receive a specified
portion of any gain realized on the sale or exchange of the real property
securing the mortgage or any gain that would be realized if such property were
sold on a specified date (i.e. shared appreciation mortgages).
19. At
least seventy-five percent (75%) of Consolidated Dynex’s gross income (excluding
gross income from prohibited transactions) for any taxable year was derived
from:
(a) interest
on obligations secured by mortgages (including consumer installment loans on
manufactured housing) on real property or on interests in real
property,
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
5
(b) gain
from the sale or other disposition of real property (including interests in real
property and interests in mortgages on real property) which was not held as
inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of its trade
or business,
(c) dividends
or other distributions on, and gain (other than gain from prohibited
transactions) from the sale or other disposition of, transferable shares (or
transferable certificates of beneficial interest) in other REITs,
(d) abatements
and refunds of taxes on real property,
(e) income
and gain derived from foreclosure property,
(f) amounts
(other than amounts the determination of which depends in whole or in part on
the income or profits of any person) received or accrued as consideration for
entering into agreements (i) to make loans secured by mortgages on real property
or on interests in real property, or (ii) to purchase or lease real property
(including interests in real property and interests in mortgages on real
property),
(g) gain
from the sale or other disposition of real estate assets which is not a
prohibited transaction solely by reason of section 857(b)(6), and
(h) income
which was attributable to stock or debt instruments acquired through the
temporary investment of new capital and received or accrued during the one year
period beginning on the date on which Consolidated Dynex received such
capital.
20. At
least ninety-five percent (95%) of Consolidated Dynex’s gross income (excluding
gross income from prohibited transactions) for any taxable year was derived
from:
(a) sources
which satisfy the seventy-five percent (75%) income test described in paragraph
19 above,
(b) dividends,
and
(c) interest.
21. For
each taxable year, the deduction for dividends paid during the taxable year
(determined without regard to capital gains dividends) equaled or
exceeded (i) the sum of ninety percent (90%) of Consolidated Dynex’s real estate
investment trust taxable income for the taxable year (determined without regard
to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains), and
ninety percent (90%) of the excess of the
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
6
net
income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income
by section 857(b)(4)(A), minus (ii) any excess noncash income as determined
under section 857(e).
22. All
distributions paid by Consolidated Dynex with respect to its Shares were pro
rata with no preference to any share of stock as compared to any other shares of
the same class and with no preference (other than as required under the Amended
Articles of Incorporation of Dynex between its common and preferred stock) to
one class of stock as compared to another class.
23. As
of the close of any taxable year, Consolidated Dynex had no earnings and profits
accumulated in any non-REIT year.
24. During
its taxable year 2006, Dynex has had at least 2000 shareholders of record of its
Shares on any dividend record date. Since 2001, Dynex had at least
2000 shareholders of record of its Shares in any dividend record
date.
25. Promptly
after the end of each taxable year, Dynex demanded written statements from
shareholders of record who on any dividend record date owned 5% or more of the
Shares disclosing (i) the actual owners of the Shares (those persons required to
include Dynex’s dividends in gross income), (ii) and the maximum number of
Shares (including the number and face value of securities convertible into
Shares) that were considered owned, directly or indirectly (within the meaning
of section 544 as modified by section 856(h)) by each of the actual
owners of the Shares.
26. Dynex
maintained the information received with respect to such written demands in its
filing district available for inspection by the Internal Revenue Service at any
time.
27. Dynex
maintained sufficient records to show that it complied with the 75% test
described at paragraph 11 above for all taxable years in its filing district
available for inspection by the Internal Revenue Service at any
time.
28. Dynex
has owned all the stock of each qualified REIT subsidiary at all times during
the period of such corporation's existence.
29. Dynex
and SMFC Funding Corporation (“SMFC”) have properly and timely made a joint
election to treat SMFC as a taxable REIT subsidiary. Dynex has not
made any other election to treat any other corporation as a taxable REIT
subsidiary.
30. Not
more than twenty percent (20%) of the value of Consolidated Dynex’s total assets
consisted of the securities of one or more taxable REIT
subsidiaries.
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
7
31. Since
its inception Consolidated Dynex has adopted a calendar year accounting
period.
32. During
its 2007 taxable year and subsequent taxable years, Consolidated Dynex expects
to continue to satisfy all of the representations described in paragraphs 1
through 31 above.
As used
herein, the term “prohibited transaction” means the sale or other disposition of
property held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of Consolidated Dynex’s trade or business. The term
“foreclosure property” means any real property (including interests in real
property) and any personal property incident to such real property, acquired by
Consolidated Dynex as the result of its having bid in such property at
foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced such property to ownership or
possession by agreement or process of law after there was a default (or default
was imminent) on a lease of such property or on an indebtedness which such
property secured. Such term does not include property acquired by
Consolidated Dynex as a result of indebtedness arising from the sale or other
disposition of property held as inventory or for sale in the ordinary course of
Consolidated Dynex’s trade or business which was not originally acquired as
foreclosure property.
Based
solely on the documents, assumptions, and representations set forth above, and
without further investigation, we are of the opinion that Consolidated Dynex
qualified as a REIT in its 2006 taxable year and that its organization and
contemplated method of operation are such that it will continue to so qualify
for its 2007 taxable year and subsequent taxable years. Except as
described herein we have performed no further due diligence and have made no
efforts to verify the accuracy or genuineness of the documents, assumptions, and
representations set forth above.
The
ability of Consolidated Dynex to qualify as a REIT for subsequent taxable years
will depend on future events, some of which are not within the control of
Consolidated Dynex. Additionally, it is not possible to predict
whether the statements, representations, warranties or assumptions on which we
have relied to issue this opinion will continue to be accurate in the
future. We will not review Consolidated Dynex’s compliance with the
documents or assumptions, or the representations set forth
above. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results
of Consolidated Dynex’s operations for any given taxable year will satisfy the
requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.
The
foregoing opinion is based on current provisions of the Code and Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder, published administrative interpretations
thereof, and published court decisions, any of which may be changed at any time,
possibly with retroactive effect (collectively “Law”). The Internal
Revenue Service has not yet issued Regulations or administrative interpretations
with respect to various provisions of the
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
March 27,
2008
Page
8
Code
relating to REIT qualification. No assurance can be given that the
Law will not change in a way that will prevent Consolidated Dynex from
qualifying as a REIT or that the Internal Revenue Service will not disagree with
this opinion.
This
opinion is limited to the federal tax laws of the United States of America and
is expressed as of the date hereof. This opinion also is limited to
the matters expressly stated, and no opinion is implied or may be inferred
beyond such matters. This opinion is further limited in that it does
not purport to opine on the federal income tax consequences that may result to
the extent that any of the representations or assumptions contained in this
opinion are not true or there has been an adverse change in the
Law. We do not assume any obligation to update or supplement this
opinion to reflect any fact or circumstance which hereafter comes to our
attention or any change in Law which hereafter occurs. This opinion
represents our best legal judgment, but it has no binding effect or official
status of any kind, and no assurance can be given that contrary positions may
not be taken by the Internal Revenue Service or a court considering the
issues. This
opinion letter is solely for the information and use of the addressee and may
not be relied upon, quoted, or otherwise used for any purpose by any other
person without our express prior written consent.
We
consent to the references to this firm in the prospectus filed with the
Registration Statement and to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement in which the prospectus is included. In giving
this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are within the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules
and Regulations of the Commission thereunder.
Very
truly yours,
/s/
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP